August 2005 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 1
2005 CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: STERLING CITY
CAMPUS NAME: STERLING CITY J H Campus Rating: Academically Acceptable
CAMPUS NUMBER: 216901041 Grade Span: 06 - 08
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS (TAKS) TABLE
Required
|------------- 2005 -------------||--------- 2004 ---------||----- Improvement -----|
Number Pct Stu Number Pct Met
Performance Met Number Met Grp Met Number Met Min Act Met
Results Std Taking Std % Std Taking Std Size Chg RI RI?
Reading/ELA
All Students 45 62 73% 100% 44 60 73% 0
African Amer * * * * * * * *
Hispanic 15 25 60% 40% 11 19 58% 2
White 30 37 81% 60% 33 41 80% 1
Econ Disadv 19 28 68% 45% 14 23 61% 7
Writing
All Students 21 24 88% 100% * * 95% -7
African Amer * * * * * * * *
Hispanic 6 9 67% 38% * * 86% -19
White * * > 99% * * * > 99% *
Econ Disadv * * 85% * * * 90% -5
Social Studies
All Students * * 91% * 16 19 84% 7
African Amer * * * * * * * *
Hispanic * * 80% * * * * *
White * * > 99% * * * 87% *
Econ Disadv * * 91% * * * * *
Mathematics
All Students 39 63 62% 100% 45 63 71% Yes -9 ** No
African Amer * * * * * * * *
Hispanic 14 26 54% 41% 15 22 68% -14
White 25 37 68% 59% 30 41 73% Yes -5 -2 No
Econ Disadv 18 29 62% 46% 16 23 70% -8
Science
All Students * * * * * * * *
African Amer * * * * * * * *
Hispanic * * * * * * * *
White * * * * * * * *
Econ Disadv * * * * * * * *
** Met the minimum size requirement, but did not meet the 65% floor for Recognized.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
STATE-DEVELOPED ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT II (SDAA II) TABLE
|-------------- 2005 --------------|
# Tests Pct Stu
SDAA II Met # Met Grp
Results ARD Tests ARD %
All Students * * 85% *
SDAA II data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to grade span, small numbers, or no data.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXCEPTIONS TABLE
Number Msrs Number Number Floor(s) Msr(s) Used
Evaluated Allowed Needed Met? in 2004? Exceptions Applied
6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
August 2005 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY PAGE 2
2005 CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY DATA TABLES - STANDARD PROCEDURES
DISTRICT NAME: STERLING CITY
CAMPUS NAME: STERLING CITY J H Campus Rating: Academically Acceptable
CAMPUS NUMBER: 216901041 Grade Span: 06 - 08
Analysis groups used to determine ratings are highlighted in BLUE.
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%) are used to protect student confidentiality.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
COMPLETION RATE TABLE (Gr. 9-12)
Required
|----------- Class of 2004 ------------||--- Class of 2003 ----||------ Improvement ------|
Stu Met
# Com- # Non- # in Comp Grp # Com- # in Comp Min Act Met
pleters compltrs Class Rate % pleters Class Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students - - - - - - - - -
African Amer - - - - - - - - -
Hispanic - - - - - - - - -
White - - - - - - - - -
Econ Disadv - - - - - - - - -
Completion data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to grade span, small numbers, or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE TABLE (Gr. 7-8)
Required
|------------ 2003-04 -------------||--------- 2002-03 ---------||----- Improvement ------|
# Official Stu # Official Met
Official # 7-8 Dropout Grp Official # 7-8 Dropout Min Act Met
Dropouts Graders Rate % Dropouts Graders Rate Size Chg RI RI?
All Students 0 55 0.0% 100% 0 54 0.0% 0.0
African Amer 0 0 - 0% 0 0 - -
Hispanic 0 21 0.0% 38% 0 20 0.0% 0.0
White 0 34 0.0% 62% 0 34 0.0% 0.0
Econ Disadv 0 19 0.0% 35% 0 19 0.0% 0.0
Dropout data not evaluated for your accountability rating due to grade span, small numbers, or no data.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
|